I bought my Big Agnes Fly Creek UL 1 in 2010 after my backpacking trip in Kauai’i. I had carried a 5 pound tent on that trip that I ended up trading to someone for 2 weeks worth of food. Sometimes I look back on that decision with regret, as the North Face Rock 22 was actually a great tent. I don’t have much of a need for it now, but compared to the Fly Creek, it was like a mansion (excellent car camping tent).
The Fly Creek has since been a very handy companion. Weighing in at 2 pounds, it was never a burden to carry and it lasted through many trips; including my thru-hike of the PCT. It always kept the rain out (and I saw some serious rain in this tent), it kept me incredibly warm on cold nights and it provided me with a sense of privacy and security that I sometimes really needed in more crowded areas. I could have the tent set up or broken down in less than 2 minutes, and without a rain fly I watched many starry nights through the mesh ceiling.
I really only came out of owning this tent with 3 complaints:
- Condensation. This tent is small, so with my style of restless sleep the sleeping bag was often in contact with the tent wall. I would regularly have to do some moisture control during my hike, taking all of my gear out of my pack to dry. This was a nuisance at times, though never the end of the world.
- Front Entry. I realize I’m not a fan of this after all these years. This is really just a personal preference and I can’t exactly pinpoint what I dislike about it, just that I prefer a side entry tent. I think side entry is easier to get in and out of, especially during a rainstorm, and I feel a larger vestibule has many benefits. Sometimes you find you need to cook something while in your shelter, and with a small front vestibule I’d sometimes forgo cooking as a safety concern. Also, a larger vestibule gives more space for gear storage; that and a larger window to the world when the rain fly is open.
- No head room. I couldn’t sit up in this tent, so it was difficult to change clothes in there, and during rainstorms I was always stuck laying down.
In the end I wouldn’t even replace the tent if I didn’t have to. But, after years of use this old girl has been through a lot. On a recent backpacking trip in the Alpine Lakes Wilderness some sort of rodent decided they wanted in, and also having issue with front entry decided to nibble on through the bathtub floor. I fixed this with Gorilla Tape but it’s not a long term solution, especially if I want to take this tent on the CDT. Then, just a few weeks ago up on Mt. Hood, one of the poles cracked open. I realize this is all replaceable in a piecemeal fashion, but the tent has seen better days and it is time for an upgrade.
Now, I’m swimming in a sea of options. There are so many great tents out there, and I have to decide what is going to work best for me. The factors that I’m weighing in my decision are:
- Weight. My main goal is to keep the tent under 2 pounds, which in this day and age is not a difficult task, especially with the popularity of cuben fiber.
- Size. I basically want to be sure my sleeping bag isn’t going to be in contact with the tent wall all night. A rectangular floor design would be better here, as opposed to the Fly Creek’s tapered floor. I also want some head room so I can sit up comfortably and change clothes without making it look like I’m wrestling a bear in my tent.
- Free standing. I like the idea of a tent that doesn’t need to be staked out. Some tents require 8+ stakes, and this can be a challenge in certain terrain. This isn’t necessarily going to be a deciding factor, but it would be especially cool if I could find a free standing tent that has the other features I seek.
- Side entry.
- Cost. Let’s face it, tents are expensive. I definitely want something that is going to last, and therefore be worth the cost, but I also have to be somewhat frugal. I still can’t justify the cost of cuben fiber right now, especially since silnylon has always worked well for me.
With these factors in mind, I have narrowed down my selection to the following candidates:
Tarptent Rainbow: This is my number one choice at the moment. It has all of the features I am looking for in a tent, including an affordable price tag. It can be set up without stakes, using trekking poles to stretch out the head and foot of the tent; it has an adjustable bathtub floor to help with splashback from rain, or conversely add more ventilation to help with condensation; it has a large vestibule with side entry and is light enough to justify taking on a thru-hike. I think the only thing that would sell this tent is a removable rain fly. I like to lay in my tent and stare out at the world through the mesh ceiling, and this one always has the rain fly attached.
Lightheart Solo: This is a very attractive tent, especially when the price tag and weight are factored in. It uses trekking poles for setup, eliminating the need for tent poles (though does require stakes), and it has a great side entry with large mesh walls for taking in views. It is the cheapest tent I am looking at, and my only hesitation is the floor plan, which has a large footprint, and it is not free standing. With a diamond shaped floor as opposed to a rectangular shape, I am concerned with the sleeping bag/tent wall contact issue, though talking with a friend who has this tent, he said condensation wasn’t really an issue for him (and he’s 6′ tall).
Big Agnes Copper Spur UL1: This tent eliminates the problems I had with the Fly Creek, but it costs over $100 more than my other options. I will admit that I coveted this tent on the PCT. I’d be struggling in my tiny little Fly Creek while I watched friends spread out in their Copper Spur so comfortably. It’s a dreamy tent, but keeping in mind that it’s just a sleeping space, it is more luxury than anything. I only add it to the list because in a fancy world, I’d buy this tent without hesitation … but I don’t live in a fancy world, and likely won’t be purchasing this tent anytime soon. I figured it deserved honorable mention.
Other tents with honorable mention:
Hexamid Solo: I can’t justify the cost of cuben fiber. Plus, this requires more stakes than I’m wanting to wrestle with on a nightly basis. I love the concept of this tent, and the weight alone is drool worthy.
Duomid: I love the idea of the simplicity of this tent, but I would want to add the innernet which costs an additional $175. Sometimes it all comes down to the almighty dollar.
So, that’s where my head is at regarding tents right now. I will be pulling the trigger sometime in January – so there is time to learn about a whole new tent, or to become better educated regarding the tents I’m considering.
Do you have experience with any of these tents?
Do you have suggestions for tents I should consider?
November 19, 2015 at 8:10 pm
I like when people research gear options so I don’t have to, thanks! All these tents look good to me.
I have a front door tent now and agree a side door is better; the door is my main complaint. Besides access, side doors make it easier to look outside when you’re lying in the tent.
When I can’t use tent stakes to put up my TarpTent Contrail, I’m able to tie the guy strings to rocks (roots, tree branches, etc) instead. I’d think with the clever horizontal use of trekking poles on the Rainbow, you could rely on weighting or tying off the tent more often and not bring stakes, or not as many. The design looks like a good compromise between free standing and pole-standing, solving the saggy nylon issue with only one extra tent pole (and one built in).
Freestanding are great because you can pick them up and easily put them in a better location, but they are not _necessarily_ easier to pitch in difficult terrain; I’m able to pitch the Contrail under, over, and around all kinds of obstructions which wouldn’t be as easy with a fully-framed self-standing tent. The Rainbow looks like it has some of the advantages of both tent styles.
Because I carry trekking poles, I’d take the Rainbow or the Solo over the UL1 on a thruhike in the usual half of the year. I’d rather sleep in the UL1, but I’d rather carry the others, and I prefer to cowboy camp anyway when the stars are out anyway. I think the UL1 is more of a backpacking tent, or foul weather tent? Unless the CDT gets A LOT more rain than the PCT? Also, it sucks when tent poles break and the lightweight ones are particularly prone to it. Trekking poles are sturdy.
I like the look of the Duomid, though from the perspective that it is an improved tarp. I tarped it on my accidental PCT sobo leg this year with just a sheet of Tyvek and my ground tarp, and that hillbilly setup makes the shaped Duomid look like a lightweight palace. Big plus that it has walls almost to ground. I’d rig up a cheaper bug screen though, or plan to just use my head net. With a ground tarp, I’d think you’d just need to hang centerpoint mosquito netting (or sew it) and hang it from the top of the tent, also saving on the weight of the zipper. Maybe somebody has done that?
Cuben is right out.
My own choice, though, would be the TarpTent Notch. Lighter than the Rainbow, more expensive than the Solo but with a rectangular bathtub. Not freestanding or taut, but the shape should be better than my Contrail when the nylon sags. Have you ruled out the Notch?
LikeLike
November 19, 2015 at 9:41 pm
I’ll have to look into it further…though it looks good at a quick glance. I think the rainbow ends up having more floor space.
LikeLike
November 24, 2015 at 3:34 am
I hiked the PCT this year with a partner — we had the double rainbow and loved it! I knew two people on trail who had the single rainbow and they liked it, but they wished they had payed the extra $30 bucks for more space and two doors…it’s only 7 ounces more. Just something to consider : )
LikeLike
November 26, 2015 at 4:06 am
Hi Jill. Thanks for the input! I had similar ideas on the PCT (the larger tent being worth a few extra ounces), but my ideas are very different for the CDT. The difference between the Rainbow and the Lightheart is 7 ounces already, so the double is almost a whole pound heavier. I’m leaning towards the lighter option now as I’m trying to get my base weight as close to 10 as possible. Oh, to have the luxury of a 2 person tent though!
LikeLike